I acquired a brace of nice chucks today. Just had to clean off a very light bit of surface rust and strip and clean the pair.
View attachment 244505
These are nice chucks. The scrolls are hardened so resist wear very well. The larger one has the steel inserts for the jaws to slide on.
very nice Pete. Do you have backplates.
Mind I ask?£.
no one ever puts what they paid for itA 1980s honda generator that's done no serious work at all....
Bought as a power cut set to power a dialysis machine. Sat most of its life in the corner of a garage
Not sure that i need it... but its shiney
View attachment 244527 View attachment 244528 View attachment 244529
that would be a very complicated convoluted answerno one ever puts what they paid for it![]()
no one ever puts what they paid for it![]()
I'm almost thinking to buy this as first car
Fiat 126 ,roll cage,fire extinguisher, battery kill switch ,recaro seats , Martini racing livrea,bixenon lights , FIA registered
My father is thinking to buy it for me
I have no garage I should park it outside![]()
The standardisation of the metre was originally defined in 1889 with a platinum/iridium "standard metre" reference: much more accurate than the yard standards (which, at the time the metre was standardised, were shrinking every year due to the manufacturing methods of the standard).
What has changed over the years is moving from a reference sample (which is inherently subject to changes as materials move) to the distance light travels in a vacuum in a certain amount of time (a universal physical constant that is the same everywhere in the universe). That was adopted in 1983, so a bit more than 8 years ago (there was also an interim standard from 1960 to 1983 that was based on wavelengths of light in krypton-86).
In 1834 the parliament building burnt down. Inside the parliament building was the reference yard that defined how long a yard was. That was the one that every yard was compared to in order to check that they were right. The reference yard melted and for 21 years, no-one really knew how long a yard was. It was redefined based on copies of the original yard, but (to silly levels of precision), it was probably very slightly different to the original one.
The yard was finally properly standardised (via the inch) in 1930 when the inch was defined as being exactly 25.4 mm and therefore it is as accurate a measure as the metre, on which it is based. If there is any measurement errors inherent in the metre, they are present in the inch as well.
Being exactly 25.4 mm ...what an odd measurement , some twerp has converted an inch to metric surely .
At the time of standardisation, the UK inch was 25.399977 mm and the US inch was 25.4000508 mm (albeit measured at slightly different temperatures). The UK one was based on a prototype yard whereas the American one was based on a different metric conversion: 1 m being 39.37 inches.
25.4 mm was an approximation chosen by Carl Johansson (inventor of gauge blocks) and as his "jo blocks" had became so popular, his definition had become the de facto standard even though it differed (by a few parts-per-million) from the official standards.
Anyway, the end result is that if anyone tells you that imperial is more accurate† than metric (or vice versa for that matter), they're wrong. If anyone tells you that imperial was ever more accurate† than metric, they're still wrong, but metric was more accurate† than imperial until 1930 (or up to 1935 depending on country).
† by "accurate" here, I mean precisely defined