While I understand your reasoning in most cases you would be being over cautious.
Re silicone grease, my understanding is that silicone should be totally avoided on electrical connections
If the existing route proves a no-go it may be worth checking the wall thickness below the window as sometimes croft houses have thin walls under windows even if the original inset has been framed flush with the walls to provide a deep cill. If there is a socket or other access it's worth a look, failing that you could make a very small hole in the plasterboard/ insulation and poke around with a coat hanger type wire to see if there is a significant void. Our croft house has about 600mm of stone in the main walls but only about 200 - 250mm below the windows.No, I think the coax was built in when the window was installed. It doesn’t follow a straight path.
Yes, I used it all over my boat and the connections kept like new. Use it all over car stuff now as well.I use on aerial connections, to pack limit switches, on crimps etc. Stuff stays like new.
I know what you mean. Our last croft-type house was as you describe, but I filled them in with studding, to make a decent-sized windowsill, anticipating it would used for storage of lots of crap, which it was, and a cat lookout point , which it also was.If the existing route proves a no-go it may be worth checking the wall thickness below the window as sometimes croft houses have thin walls under windows even if the original inset has been framed flush with the walls to provide a deep cill. If there is a socket or other access it's worth a look, failing that you could make a very small hole in the plasterboard/ insulation and poke around with a coat hanger type wire to see if there is a significant void. Our croft house has about 600mm of stone in the main walls but only about 200 - 250mm below the windows.
Nah, they just shifted it down a bit.but I had it in mind that the modern aerials were designed to reject mobile signals.
Unfortunately, it’s an old stone croft house, and the wall is 700mm thick. I’d rather not drill it if I don’t have to.
Out of interest, I asked about the wiggly track balun on Physics Forums. I find that several sources are often best when seeking an explanantion.RF can be "funny stuff" to work with. The printed circuit track between the two ends of the antenna could basically be a delay line, where the 180 degree out of phase signals at the two antenna terminals end up being in phase at the right hand antenna teminal in the middle image. The "ground" copper surrounds the "wiggly" track, and may help to perform some sort of impedance transformation. I suspect there were a good few prototype variations.
A Group B antenna would seem to be the one best suited to Rosemarkie's transmissions. Group K would be a 2nd choice.
![]()
Forget The Coax, Wire Up Your Antennas With Cat 6 Cable
These days, anything with copper in it is expensive. If you doubt that, a walk into any Home Depot electrical department, where the wire is locked up tighter than Fort Knox, will prove otherwise. C…hackaday.com
Will this help??

I’ve only just got around to putting up the cheapie log periodic aerial, using a compass to point it in the right direction.
Before that, I hooked up this crappy signal strength meter:
View attachment 528159
But, swinging the aerial back and forth over 180deg, it didn’t waver from one green light, or 50 dBuV. So, I went back to the compass bearing and tested the TV - all channels booming in nicely, although it was at night we were getting the problem.
Do I conclude that the signal strength meter is useless? The signal must be strong here to power through the corroded, balun-less contractor one that was there before.
Cheers - yes, the quoted range is 40-862 MHz. Probably more of a useful device for old analogue signals.It's a Philex, 'nuff said. Wide as a barn door, so you can't pick out a single multiplex.
Assuming it is not just unfit for the purpose...
What you can do is to provide some sort of attenuation, either a proper resistive one, or arrange a small disconnection gap to limit the signal so that you can see any change.
However, maximum signal rarely coincides with minimum BER which is the important reading, but modern modulation methods are generally robust enough to be useable even when the BER is not ideal.
Cheers - yes, the quoted range is 40-862 MHz. Probably more of a useful device for old analogue signals.
It’s up and installed now, and seems to work. Any more problems and I’ll be forced to buy a decent aerial and coax (already recommended above!).
I did use it to verify that a car key fob was transmitting. In fact, the only time it has been useful!The meter is not looking for modulation, so the analogue / digital business is irrelevant as it is purely reading the field strength of any RF signal over the entire band and maybe well outside it too.






