Blobber
Forum Supporter
- Messages
- 3,180
- Location
- lincolnshire
I know we have a few famery types on here so any thoughts on this model please? are they any good? Its only for our smallholding so we dont need anything huge! 

I wouldn't be surprised if it was less than that. Our neighbour has Quicke loaders on both of his 100hp+ New Hollands and they're only good for a little over a tonne.Doubt the loader will lift a ton, many only lift about 800kg.
I think it would lift what I need otherwise I will be going too bigDoubt the loader will lift a ton, many only lift about 800kg. Worth checking. Price seems good considering loader and decent tyres, assume its only 2wd. How many hours? Go see it make sure its real and as good as it looks.
Same guy also has a 36 hp Kubota that would probably do you too.
Mainly hay making which is small bales, hedge cutting and general duties really, we have 12 acres so not hugelooks good, depends also on how big your small holding is and what your actually going to use it for.
Thats one thing I noticed, not sure how I could free them up/alter the install to get over thatThey're a good little tractor generally. The front loader is fed off of the rear spool valves which I don't like though.
I had a case 695 similar vintage, did everything I wanted except lift a full builders bag with ease. And been 2wd got stuck in my muddy bit easily. Would lift about 750 maybe 800 on the forks. Not so good if you buy feed by the ton pallet.As blobber says, it is for a small holding though, so sure 800kg will be plenty?! A heavy large round bale maybe weighs 500-600kg max? So most will be less.
Cant imagine it been too difficult to connect loader in somewhere else to get your spools back useable. Just be a case of T ing into the hydraulic supply line somewhere. Thats been done the quick lazy way.They're a good little tractor generally. The front loader is fed off of the rear spool valves which I don't like though.
Hydraulics on that era of smaller tractors weren't really geared to adding many extras, so the most practical solution was to simply run of the spools, as it's quite rare that you would actually need to use the loader, and the spool at the same time.I had a case 695 similar vintage, did everything I wanted except lift a full builders bag with ease. And been 2wd got stuck in my muddy bit easily. Would lift about 750 maybe 800 on the forks. Not so good if you buy feed by the ton pallet.
Cant imagine it been too difficult to connect loader in somewhere else to get your spools back useable. Just be a case of T ing into the hydraulic supply line somewhere. Thats been done the quick lazy way.
I'm going to try and see it next week, that's if they still have it and it's not an advert from 2022@Blobber my personal opinion is that if it seems all good mechanically when you look at it, buy it. Run it and see if it does all you need. These JDs of this vintage just don't seem to lose money . So if it's a tad too small, you have something functional while.you look for something bigger.
We have the same acreage as you but some of it is very steep so I went for 4wd. It just happened it was a JD and of similar vintage to what you are looking at. Mine had no loader. I bought a 655c digger though and that will do those jobs! These machines are addictive...
Liar liar pants on fire….one machine isnt enoughI'm going to try and see it next week, that's if they still have it and it's not an advert from 2022
We're flat as a pancake here and we very rarely use anything heavy when it gets wet/muddy! I'm not falling into the trap of buying lots of machines, nope certainly not, definitely not, nope not me
I agree. Having bought a wheeled diggerafter the tractor, I can see so many uses for a little tracked machine now. I will stop there.... honest....Liar liar pants on fire….one machine isnt enough