prepman
Member
- Messages
- 2,757
- Location
- Gwynedd UK
I'll get some...Don't **** with en3 or en8 it's not what it used to be. Go straight to alloy steels like EN19/24.
Or have it ground.
@pressbrake1 has had lots of fun with long bars recently.
I'll get some...Don't **** with en3 or en8 it's not what it used to be. Go straight to alloy steels like EN19/24.
Or have it ground.
@pressbrake1 has had lots of fun with long bars recently.
Probably because of the amount of recycled steel in it?Don't **** with en3 or en8 it's not what it used to be. Go straight to alloy steels like EN19/24.
Or have it ground.
@pressbrake1 has had lots of fun with long bars recently.
Don't **** with en3 or en8 it's not what it used to be. Go straight to alloy steels like EN19/24.
Or have it ground.
@pressbrake1 has had lots of fun with long bars recently.
Too low in carbonProbably because of the amount of recycled steel in it?
Alcohol is filthI'm pretty sure pressbrake doesn't drink, so i doubt you'll find him there!
Hush your mouth, Sir!Alcohol is filth
Chuck was trued with grinder/jig prior to and is relatively new, bearings are good no deflection.Bearing deflection and wear will prevent a lathe from turning chucking work true
Worn chucks feel like they’re gripping well but the job is moving which will cause taper
And a worn bed on a elderly machine
I mentioned chuck for future reference for othersChuck was trued with grinder/jig prior to and is relatively new, bearings are good no deflection.
PS: chuck wasn't used it was in a morse holder with drawbar for final 3 tries.
Unfortunately the thread gas meandered (as usual) away from what I wanted to discuss. Which was an attempt at using a laser to check for bed twist rather than using sensitive levels.I mentioned chuck for future reference for others
Id agree having played with a laser edge finder in both mill and the old lathe.I actually typed a response to using a laser and didn't post it before so here it is now.
The dot on the laser is massive, in terms of lathe alignment. You'll be lucky if you can get it down to a 10 thou diameter IF you can turn down the intensity. If you could get it to 1 thou it would still be too fat IMO.
Point taken....But that is surmountable IMHO. If you are looking for deflection the size of target image is irrelevant. However variance in size would be. But providing the centre of point can be determined it should be possible.I actually typed a response to using a laser and didn't post it before so here it is now.
The dot on the laser is massive, in terms of lathe alignment. You'll be lucky if you can get it down to a 10 thou diameter IF you can turn down the intensity. If you could get it to 1 thou it would still be too fat IMO.

I sincerely apologise and I will never blight this forum with my 34 years experience as a machine builder again.Unfortunately the thread gas meandered (as usual) away from what I wanted to discuss. Which was an attempt at using a laser to check for bed twist rather than using sensitive levels.
The fact that I'd produced a taper was a side issue. Although many helpful comments appreciated.
My theory being that once the beam had been centred from tailstock to head stock, at both ends of bed, traversing out and doing the same over the length of the bed would indicate a twist if any present, with a rise or fall of the point of the target. This can be amplified using a simple angled mirror, A technique quite common in instrumentation.
Anything indicated can only be twist and not wear.
Go in peace my child......I sincerely apologise and I will never blight this forum with my 34 years experience as a machine builder again.







