The DB thing looks like one of those 1920s 30s art deco caricatures, straight out of some Isadora Duncan type thing.Getting back on topic*.....
View attachment 516270
The top one is the much-maligned Jaguar.
Next is an Audi design exercise.
Third is a Daimler-Benz Mercedes.
Who employs the former chief stylist of JLR and released their image a month after JLR did theirs.
Coincidence?
I hate to admit it, but the D-B one comes closest to my preferred proportions, even though those tyre to wheel arch gaps will never see life in the real world:
View attachment 516274
*I apologise for flouting the unwritten rules of this esteemed Forum.
It's what the chavs of London would like...This claims to be the D-B concept front end. I think some-one used the wrong prompts for the AI:
I see they have done away with a stylist with taste and replaced "him / her" with an 8 year old with a felt tip.This claims to be the D-B concept front end. I think some-one used the wrong prompts for the AI:
View attachment 516304
![]()
Mercedes channels Gullwing in first look at next S-Class | Autocar
New limo to inherit concept’s bold grille design and steer-by-wire techwww.autocar.co.uk
Maybe his new boss hated the Jaguar debacle.![]()
JLR axes design boss Gerry McGovern | Autocar
Sources tell Autocar and Autocar India that the Coventry-born designer was asked to leave the firm on Mondaywww.autocar.co.uk
Wild Ideas
etc...
The Swiss did it in the late 1940's with trolley buses to allow them to go off-piste.A few years ago there was a prototype tram design trialled (I think near Sheffield) that used a massive horizontal flywheel under the floor to provide the motive force. At every stop a motor hidden under the platform would pop out, couple itself to the flywheel (like a bicycle tyrewall dynamo in reverse) and spin it back up to max. rpm for the next leg of the journey.
![]()
JLR axes design boss Gerry McGovern | Autocar
Sources tell Autocar and Autocar India that the Coventry-born designer was asked to leave the firm on Mondaywww.autocar.co.uk
Not necessarily, given the level of seniority, how much a head of design needs to know about future direction, and how commercially sensitive strategy information is I could see the company deciding that any parting of ways that wasn't 100% mutual needed to be as quick as possible.That doesn't sound like it's related to the rebranding excercise. That would be a garden leave, reputationally intact way of being let go.
It sounds like it's related to gross misconduct of some form.
Consumerism, that's why.I remember as a kid we cycled round to a neighbours house to look at the new VW Scirocco.
40 years later its still a good looking car.
I don't understand why car manufacturers keep turning out stuff that is so unappealing to the eye (or specifically to my eyes!).
I remember as a kid we cycled round to a neighbours house to look at the new VW Scirocco.
40 years later its still a good looking car!
I don't understand why car manufacturers keep turning out stuff that is so unappealing to the eye (or specifically to my eyes!).
I remember as a kid we cycled round to a neighbours house to look at the new VW Scirocco.
40 years later its still a good looking car!
I don't understand why car manufacturers keep turning out stuff that is so unappealing to the eye (or specifically to my eyes!).



