Sue the drunk driver for criminal damage. Perhaps with "Small Claims Court" action. The driver will then refer it to the insurers for settlement and not involve your insurer.
I have a black 2006 Honda Civic 1.8 VTEC. It is the only one of my cars that actually works. Or it did, until 1 a.m. this morning, when the Police rang my doorbell to inform me that, whilst parked in the street, it had been hit from behind by a drunk driver in a BMW, and pushed into a Council parking ticket machine. The driver is in Police custody, and the Honda is a write-off.
ive pulled up your quotesThe other car is a 1-year old BMW 330 SE Hybrid. According to the Motor Insurance Database ( askMID website ), it is insured.
The Police have just been round to ask me if I saw it happen - I did not. The guy is still in custody, is refusing to make a statement, and refuses to admit that he was the driver.
The incident had been called in by a passing taxidriver. When I went out the BMW was jammed against my car, headlights on full, airbags deployed, empty. The cop car and one officer had gone, taking the "breathalysed suspect" to the station. I don't know where this guy was when they grabbed him.
yep , and its a bit like Ben Johnstons left leg ,,,,Yes this is true, but it's the way it's worded that impacts your file on renewal date..."Have you had any accidents, claims or convictions in the last..."
I'd say, it depends. If the value if the car is worth less than the hassle of chasing the BMW's insurance (minus scrap value), maybe just keep it simple and scrap it.
Your excess shouldn't come into it.
Yes, they're likely to put up premiums next year. But, unless you can be very sure the wording of the documentation means you don't, you'll probably be obliged to tell the insurance company about the situation anyway. And still be hit with a higher premium.
In this situation I'd say the council should go after the BMW driver as yes it his car but it was parked with no one in itAnd when the council want their property paid for?
Is the car insured or the person driving ?Proving who was driving shouldn't matter, the BMW did the damage, the BMW will be insured. The insurance for the BMW should pay. Id claim as the council bill will be big, and youll also need a hire car etc…
In this situation I'd say the council should go after the BMW driver as yes it his car but it was parked with no one in it
Is the right answer.Proving who was driving shouldn't matter, the BMW did the damage, the BMW will be insured. The insurance for the BMW should pay. Id claim as the council bill will be big, and youll also need a hire car etc…
Is the right answer
Is the right answer.
The council will come to you for the other damage. Just let your insurance co. sort it out, it's what they are paid for. It's unlikely to have much effect on renewal premiums. (At least, not yours. BMW driver might have a few issues!)
Depends on the on the insurance co. The decent ones will deal with it well. The 'quote cheap provide no service' type companies will do as you suggest.No way would I let my insurance Co deal with it with out knowing what they are doing... I was hit from behind, zero damage to my pickup, the other car was proper bent.
Informed insurance. yr later premiums through the roof. Its then I find out my Insurance Co, had agreed 50/50 fault. For someone who ran up my ****.
In the end I had to threaten them with legal action, before they sorted it out. Turned out he was insured with the same brokers and underwriters as I. (F'in con-artists )![]()