ajlelectronics
Member
- Messages
- 10,807
- Location
- Gloucester, England
But why? We always get people making broad statements but it makes no sense that a not for profit nationalised company is not better than a greedy money grabbing private company as Shell are proving in real life.
It's like communism (small c deliberate). It's a great idea on paper, but it never works in the real world.
With a monopoly, they are free to call the shots. They can charge what they like, give as poor a service as they like and give "jobs to the boys", whilst sticking two fingers up at anyone who complains. After all, what are customers going to do about it?
A nationalised company is worse because a private monopoly needs to stay in business and so they have to at least pay lip service to offering what the customer wants, else demand will wane; a nationalised business doesn't need to care either way. The nationalised company is then also at the behest of whatever political flavour is current, so very dangerous in my view.
Another point is that if a business isn't intended to produce a profit, then it will make a big loss.
Now coming to the railways; this is where it all gets a bit interesting. Clearly the hotch potch of different operators has been a recipe for disaster, but then so would a new "British Rail" for the reasons outlined above. I have no answers.
Last edited: