What little I understand about it.... is that Ground Source is more effective than Air Source? Yet its Air Source that seems to be being installed - I can only imagine that the reasons for this are simply that it's got to be a lot easier & cheaper to install AS, without any need to dig holes & bury stuff)?@GRW
This is all sadly so true! I come across badly installed solar, heat pumps (got 2 in my home) EV chargers almost daily. And sometimes badly installed by the bigger companies!
It's such a shame, these systems could actually be helping people, not just helping shareholders.
Greed and especially corporate greed has a lot to answer for!
Whatever, installing this kit in old, draughty buildings just smacks of "just put them in and hit a target" with no concern for the viability or impact upon the occupants (both in running costs and in terms of them paying a fortune to remain in the cold) and incredibly unethical.
(As a side note, I was dismayed in that the property I'm using as an example - is owned by the guy I've been working for. There's no way he would qualify for the Grant.... but his Tenants do! So a property owned by an individual with the assets & wherewithal to afford to pay - gets his building done for free, because his tenants meet the requirements.
How can that be right, and an ethical & responsible use of Taxpayers money??)