That's a bad design of a joint imho. The long girder needs to be joined directly to the web of the short girder to form the strongest joint.
As it it the long girder is only joined to the edges of the side flanges of the short girder and the force will be acting on the weakest part of the I beam. It is relatively easy to bend the edges of the side flanges of an I beam.
To make the strongest joint you could profile the end of the long girder to fit into the short girder and you would get a nice weld to all sides of the short girder. It would make access for welding a lot easier.
The profiling could be done off site with a plasma/laser.
If that wasn't possible just add a plate to join the centre parts of both girders, either welded to both or welded to 1 on the ground and bolted to the other in place.
The 'engineer' that designed that joint doesn't understand I beams and in what way to join them for maximum strength.
As it it the long girder is only joined to the edges of the side flanges of the short girder and the force will be acting on the weakest part of the I beam. It is relatively easy to bend the edges of the side flanges of an I beam.
To make the strongest joint you could profile the end of the long girder to fit into the short girder and you would get a nice weld to all sides of the short girder. It would make access for welding a lot easier.
The profiling could be done off site with a plasma/laser.
If that wasn't possible just add a plate to join the centre parts of both girders, either welded to both or welded to 1 on the ground and bolted to the other in place.
The 'engineer' that designed that joint doesn't understand I beams and in what way to join them for maximum strength.



