When I was an apprentice, we use to use the 70v etcher connected to metal tools strategically placed on the bench,
I googled which is more dangerous....turns out AC is a lot more dangerous than DC....I can't remember if I knew that!
Umm.Well like when removing the leads from a 12V battery, I'm assuming that you wouldn't see a spark when disconnecting the negative first.
Disconnecting earth lead first/reconnecting last has got nothing to do with arcing under load, it's about avoiding the possibility of shorting the spanner to an adjacent metal part as you tighten the battery clamp, or if you're clumsy with the jump lead.
Beat me to it. Teach me for not reading ahead.That's only to stop have a live lead loose that can easily arc on any other part of the vehicle
As neutral is at same potential to the chassis no spark
Was the cladding on Grenfell a firewall?
That sounds like a bit of a far stretch of wataboutery if you ask me.
Regarding the 400v battery packs, the problem is that in crashes they can be damaged, but in normal use they are pretty isolated, and there’s no reason for a diyer to have them apart to service a vehicle.
I suspect you meant Fibrillation?![]()
I don't know what wataboutery means, but what I was saying is wooden cladding isn't used on highrises because it's obviously flammable, whereas as most folk assume metal isn't, so is safe to "clad" or use as a "firewall" if the fire gets hot enough ally will catch fire wether its cladding a building or in a car (though granted it will hopefully give you time to get out of the car)
Not to service a vehicle, but as time goes on and the individual cells start to give up the ghost, like they do in a battery power tool. I took my drill battery apart the other week to see if it is a bad cell that's fubared which isn't too scary with 18v and only 3 cells, but you can almost guarantee that some diyer will try the same with one of the 100's or 1000's of cells in an electric car.
It's much harder to break a DC load than an AC load, You tend to need to use rotary contacts and more complexed arc shielding.I googled which is more dangerous....turns out AC is a lot more dangerous than DC....I can't remember if I knew that!
It's much harder to break an AC load than a Dc load, You tend to need to use rotary contacts and more complexed arc shielding.
....am still googling. I quite like this explanation I found although with electric vehicles with 600v batteries maybe the statistics will change.
"Realistically (statistically) speaking, AC is more dangerous that DC. This comes from the fact that 120/240v AC is the voltage that we are most likely to encounter - which can kill us. The DC voltage that we are most likely to encounter is 12 DC (in our vehicles), and it is very unlikely to kill us."
It's much harder to break an AC load than a Dc load, You tend to need to use rotary contacts and more complexed arc shielding.
I thought DC grabbed you and AC threw you ..
The 750DC third Rail on the railway is the worst and once in touch you have had it
Nonsense. Neither is safer or more dangerous both kill if you induce enough current and both will burn you internally.
I thought historically we use ac domestically because back in the day they decided it was the lesser evil, but i've just googled it and it seems ac was chosen mostly because it can be transmitted over greater distances.