Have to agree with Kram my LG has good picture quality but the remote and the operating system is complete S***e, I use my Pansonic PVR (at least 10 years old) for the program guide as the system is just so much better as others have said make sure you can get on with the operating interface.LG has great picture quality but the remote is irritating and the software is shockingly bad. It will often badger you to do updates when you turn it on or use any app. You also have to agree for your data to be sent. I do not like smart tv's..
For example, we have a bluetooth hearing aid that can connect to tv. The TV wants to connect to any paired device as soon as it sees it. You go into menu and disconnect it, then it will reconnect. Most BT devices are not as bad particually ones that are off when not in use, but this one is so irritating we have unpaired it - which is extra annoying for me as now the tv is at an extra loud level that my ears find uncomfortable.
I concurr with this post - it's allways the software that lets these things down - I guess providers come up with new gizmos, and the chipsets in the tv just can't deal with it - new operating system needed? Download the OS, sorry your tv is not compatable with this OS. So you have to bin a perfectly good tv..For what it's worth my LG (the last of the non Smart ones) is still working fine after 12 years. No idea if the build quality of their new offerings is the same.
I bought mine from Richer Sounds, you really need to have a play with one yourself to see if you're going to get on with it. Online reviews tend to gloss over things like slow laggy controls, software bugs and the like.
Don't know if it's even possible nowadays but I deliberately kept the display and the online streaming parts separate (I use an Amazon Fire stick). The first bit should last 30+ years, the second is likey to be obsolete and incompatible as soon as the streaming companies come up with their latest shiny new offering.
The Fire stick is bug-ridden shïte, I view devices like that as disposable nowadays, which is why I don't want them built into the TV.
I’ve been LG for years. I gave my last 50” to my daughter when she moved house, as she was short of funds, and promptly bought myself a 55”LG or Samsung are the only companies who still make their own sets. The rest are all bulk issue, badged according to who ordered them. Many are Vestel from Turkey, a few others are made in similar "pile 'em high" factories in China and Eastern Europe. I made a policy decision more than a decade ago, only to sell LG or Samsung. I don't recall having a single one back.
The result is that you WILL get exactly what you pay for and after sales service is likely not to be an option.
i also dont want the tech as im not interested with itHave you got an aerial signal, as well as free sat. If you rely on free sat only, some brands wont tune without an aerial signal, so youll need LG. I know this because we have no aerial signal.
Both LG and Samsung are decent brands in my opinion. They are all too dam complicated now, Im starting to dislike technology as I get older, its almost witchcraft I tell you.
Searching out a new TV is like Oyster fishing, 1 in every 1000, you might come up with a gem and every good Oyster fisherman listens to others, best spots but end of day he/she has to dive off the boat and fish.I’m looking round to buy my first smart TV, probably 43in and at the cheaper end of the spectrum. My last two TV’s were easily chosen LG’s, but is LG still a prime choice??? I’ve also been looking at Samsungs.
Looking at buyer reviews (mostly on the John Lewis site), some models seem to get complaints about their operating systems, taking 7 clicks to get a station, and comments about small size remote controls with stiff buttons. These are not problems that anybody ever commented on in the past.
Any advice about specific models, or about what to look for in general, much appreciated (pref £400 abs max). Please be nice to me; I've reached an age where this is all one big pain, which adds to my other sundry other various pains.
Thanks
I had a Humax PVR (recorder), it had the best user interface of any I've had, I used to recommend them highly, when it died (blown caps, a common problem) I lost all my recordings and found it's easier to just bin it and start again.You can't get much more straightforward than Freesat, although an older Humax receiver is preferred to a Freesat badged device which is all that you can buy now. They have carved themselves a nice little monopoly.
I lost all my recordings
If it help, ordered mine from Marks Electrical, courier delivered, seems a good shop.
I've just bought a Humax PVR, secondhand from a charity shop to replace our old Sony one which kept crashing. Very pleased with it so far, not many people use them any more but it lets you do something the streaming services don't i.e. skip through the ads. There's rarely more than 40 minutes of actual content in a one-hour program any more.That wasn't Humax being malicious, it was the Copyright protection mafia that demanded encryption for the recordings and also a device lock so that the drive couldn't be read elsewhere. The Freesat company have made matters worse by withdrawing all of the manufacturing licences and only allowing their own product to be marketed. It's (or at least was) full of bugs and "interesting" software quirks and now there is no viable alternative to them for Freesat.
I agree.I think I would recommend Hughes Electrical or Amazon, based on their returns policy.
We have two of these, so far they’ve been faultlessHisense are at cheap end of the market, Chinese of course, not as good as LG but they're building a place in China, they already build smaller TVs there.
Please be nice to me; I've reached an age where this is all one big pain, which adds to my other sundry other various pains.
Thanks
What, you let them in your house? Silly burgeri also dont want the tech as im not interested with it
as goes for brands its do your homework with them as all the makes have there issues with them as most tvs are sold in other countrys so check out reviews there whilst here in the uk we get forced to use widescreen tvs, which i hate with a vengence as i like both height and width to a tv not width on a tv
as goes for tech smart tvs id rather have basic
netflix and prime and others well those are preinstalled on most tvs nowadays and to be honest it shouldnt be used to up the price of your tv yes you can download others apps but what are those apps doing ( what other things are they collecting whilst you have that tv on )
What your smart TV knows about you – and how to stop it harvesting data
![]()
What your smart TV knows about you – and how to stop it harvesting data
Smart TVs are always gathering data about you that can be monetised. What can you opt out of – and what can you safely leave alone?www.theguardian.com
but as all TVs become “smart” – connected to the internet via your router – they are gaining the ability to watch you too. As soon as you switch them on, smart TVs made by the likes of LG, Samsung and Sony are gathering data from the TV itself, as well as from the operating system and apps. Then there are the devices you plug into your TV, such as Google’s Chromecast, Apple TV and Amazon’s Fire Stick.
now we know youtube collects info
freeview now i dont mind it to a degree my bug bear is with the ( tv license ) as i dont watch it and dont really want to pay for it either but to watch the other channels on freeview i have to pay for it the bbc channels should be encoded when you pay for the license you should get a code to de-encryt them
i have been caught with no license ( before i knew better ) they checked that the bbc was tuned in and then proceeded to check that 4 and 5 and some other channels was viewable at the time ( so if it tunes in you have to pay for it )
They had nothing at 50" or less in stock