MattF
Forum Supporter
- Messages
- 17,689
- Location
- South Yorkshire
Sh1t floats to the top, or so they tell me.
I'm sure there are quite a few who would argue that point, after a throne session.

Sh1t floats to the top, or so they tell me.
I could have a good rant about this in the motor trade, but I'll resist, and say I very much agree with your post.I have to argue about not wanting to teach, the problem is the constant watering down by governing bodies. I know for a fact that a major exam board didn’t get enough top level passes to suit the government figures, so they’ve rewritten the exam to be easier. Those that work hard, pay attention and just “get it” no longer get any form of respect, instead the dross is bumped up. To seemingly everyone else’s level so that it looks better on a spread sheet.
I have a constant argument in every educational establishment I’ve worked- aspiration is not aptitude, and just because you want to be an engineer doesn’t mean you will be, and yet we are pushed year on year to have top levels of passes. I don’t entirely blame the college management, they have to dance to the tune played by the government, written by someone who’s never done any sort of vocational job and who simply cannot see why people SHOULD fail engineering courses. I’ve seen some absolute dross get a qualification they never earned, simply because to fail them would result in a spanking from the government
I 100% agree with everything that both @m_c and @Tinbasherdan have said, however just to add to that and as someone that works in the Apprenticeship delivery space, some of the failure with Apprenticeships must lay within the workplace.I could have a good rant about this in the motor trade, but I'll resist, and say I very much agree with your post.
Multiple choice 'exams' have replaced a large amount of written exams for level 3 qualifications.
The biggest issue colleges have, is they don't get paid for apprentices that fail, so they'll do everything they can to get them to pass.
If we look historically. As an Apprentice you would have been allocated an Apprentice Master, who would have been solely responsible for your training and ensuring that you met the required standard.
Certainly within my area of work that is no longer the case, and in the majority of cases the workshop floor see that training as being the collages responsibility.
It seems to me the whole FE & HE system has been hijacked & corrupted, with (as always) Money overwhelming any intentions to actually educate & produce graduates "fit for purpose" in the work environment.I could have a good rant about this in the motor trade, but I'll resist, and say I very much agree with your post.
Multiple choice 'exams' have replaced a large amount of written exams for level 3 qualifications.
The biggest issue colleges have, is they don't get paid for apprentices that fail, so they'll do everything they can to get them to pass.
This is so sad, but completely predictable unfortunately. The bit which kills (killed) UK engineering and manufacturing are always overheads.
These take only 2 forms really, taxation and wages. All the rest is predictable and can be budgeted. New machine? Cost it, split that over X number of years, look at its productivity and you have the unit cost to factor into every job.
Taxation, wow, how do you account for that? Especially with Rachel from accounts keep changing the rules. Business rates are another mental cost. This takes no account of productivity/profitability against the required space to operate. It really should. As noted above, it takes a lot of space to cast a massive closed ended cylinder, you simply cannot cannot do this is the space that an office desk occupies.
Corporation tax is another one which is heinously unbalanced, if you're a global organisation you can have paper based loans from another part of the company and offset payments against your profits before paying tax. It amount to money laundering. The small business based solely in the UK cannot do this. Should be a much smaller percentage and be based on turnover.
Wages are a huge cost. Not so much that they are high per-sé, but the employer's costs that go with a wage are at an altogether silly level. Employer's NI, Holiday pay. Sick pay, Pension contributions - this lot really adds up. My wife is a Payroll Manager so I get to see this first hand, and in a manufacturing company, not some desk-jockey organisation. And the workforce at her place have a large Polish contingent, strange that. (They make extrusions from billet, like greenhouse frames etc)
With all this cost it is a real disadvantage compared to some far-eastern places where people work for a bowl of rice a day, factories are not taxed to oblivion and so on. Small wonder the UK based companies are closing, the game is far too unbalanced.
In 30 yrs of engineering I've seen plenty above 40 who have been exactly the same - do the barest minimum required to not get shown the door - and apparently for some, that is the way to work - the theory being why enrich the bosses?We are effectively seeing that most people under say 40yo now are about as much use in the workplace as a chocolate welding torch. No concept of any responsibility, work ethic and zero motivation etc. T
that is the way to work - the theory being why enrich the bosses?