james butler
Member
- Messages
- 1,529
- Location
- birmingham england
i thought it had dropped from 3 to 2 years?
Totally agree with you about the mobile users, I was quoting the maximum official price for a MOT as listed on the DVLA website, like you I have never paid that for a MOT but my point still stands if you can't afford a £54 test once a year then you can't afford a car.Using that logic, given that almost every new car comes with Bluetooth now, why do you still see idiots in flash cars with a mobile phone glued to their ear?
Oh yes, because they're arrogant ar53h0135.
...and the day my MOT place starts charging £54, I'll be going elsewhere.
my point still stands if you can't afford a £54 test once a year then you can't afford a car.
54quidThe last statistic I heard was that a quarter of all cars having their first MOT after 3 years were failing it, that alone should be reason enough to reduce the time rather than extend it.
Even though some were failing on very basic items such as wipers failing to clear the screen and given that a lot of people driving nowadays won't ever check their tyre condition and brake pads etc then they should be reducing the time to first test.
At the end of the day an MOT test is £54.85, if you can afford to buy a new car then surely you can afford that every year.
20,000 miles left in that![]()
Heres the front tyre on a 4 year old juke parked in my works car park, not sure whos it is.
I'll wager you had a big silly grin on your face riding your bike that day, at least until you saw the state of that tyre.You call that worn? I did this to my bike's rear tyre in the Alps...
I'll wager you had a big silly grin on your face riding your bike that day, at least until you saw the state of that tyre.
But did you carry on using it on your daily driver?
Its the new girl in the offices, all 4 tyres have completely different tread somehow, 1 rear looks new, other side half worn, the other front looks barely legal.