CompoSimmonite
Member
- Messages
- 5,930
- Location
- Werrington, Staffordshire Moorlands.
I've decided to keep, and fully rebuild, by Mahindra MM540 rather than selling now I've also got a 300TDi Disco.
Scrap is at a low & plenty of cheap Disco's with rot beyond economic repair so a plan is brewing - buy a second Disco as a parts donor. That would give me some of the missing / broken trim I also need for my own vehicle as well as all the bits I'd need to uprate the Mahindra to Disco running gear.
Seeing I have the current Disco "in front of me" I intend taking measurements first to see if viable to fit the complete engine, gearbox and transferbox of a 300TDi auto into the Mahindra. The current transfer box is a Dana 18 so the Disco LT230 is very similar and means props in correct position.
Only problem is Dana 18 is selectable 4x4 whereas LT230 is permanent 4x4. You can adapt the LT230 with a kit from Ashcrofts but at £265 for basically something to lock up the centre diff is a little steep for me seeing the FWH's that are included in the kit wouldn't be used as the Mahindra has Dana 44 axles.
Even if I did use such a kit the Dana 44 ratios are very low - 5.38:1
It's therefore got me thinking about leaving the LT230 as permanent 4x4 and using Disco axles converted to leaf springs and narrowed so they fit under the Mahindra bodywork.
The Dana 44's are far stronger axles however parts are dear / expensive to source plus drum braked so whilst the Disco axles are weaker they would be more suitable for my needs - ie cheap, easy parts availability etc.
Looking at the rear shafts on my Disco recently, when changing hub bearings, they aren't suitable for resplining if narrowed and assume front will be the same.
I suppose I could use axles unnarrowed and have arch extensions like the Defender but would like to explore narrowing first.
The shortening of the actual casing isn't a problem - its the halfshafts. They are larger dia at splines so if cut down the new area for resplining is too small. I suspect custom shafts could be made but will be outside my budget.
So - has anyone ever seen a way around making up the difference between small splines to larger spline aperture ?
Cheers.
Paul H
Scrap is at a low & plenty of cheap Disco's with rot beyond economic repair so a plan is brewing - buy a second Disco as a parts donor. That would give me some of the missing / broken trim I also need for my own vehicle as well as all the bits I'd need to uprate the Mahindra to Disco running gear.
Seeing I have the current Disco "in front of me" I intend taking measurements first to see if viable to fit the complete engine, gearbox and transferbox of a 300TDi auto into the Mahindra. The current transfer box is a Dana 18 so the Disco LT230 is very similar and means props in correct position.
Only problem is Dana 18 is selectable 4x4 whereas LT230 is permanent 4x4. You can adapt the LT230 with a kit from Ashcrofts but at £265 for basically something to lock up the centre diff is a little steep for me seeing the FWH's that are included in the kit wouldn't be used as the Mahindra has Dana 44 axles.
Even if I did use such a kit the Dana 44 ratios are very low - 5.38:1
It's therefore got me thinking about leaving the LT230 as permanent 4x4 and using Disco axles converted to leaf springs and narrowed so they fit under the Mahindra bodywork.

The Dana 44's are far stronger axles however parts are dear / expensive to source plus drum braked so whilst the Disco axles are weaker they would be more suitable for my needs - ie cheap, easy parts availability etc.
Looking at the rear shafts on my Disco recently, when changing hub bearings, they aren't suitable for resplining if narrowed and assume front will be the same.
I suppose I could use axles unnarrowed and have arch extensions like the Defender but would like to explore narrowing first.
The shortening of the actual casing isn't a problem - its the halfshafts. They are larger dia at splines so if cut down the new area for resplining is too small. I suspect custom shafts could be made but will be outside my budget.
So - has anyone ever seen a way around making up the difference between small splines to larger spline aperture ?
Cheers.
Paul H