I had a Ford Essex V6 motor like that, the bell housing holes were tapped 10mm but the rest was UNC. That was U.K. made too.The mericuns went through a few years of metrinch buggerence, some engines were built with metric threads but the rear engine face was tapped for imperial bell housing bolts. Tractors/plant are still bad for the mishmash of both.
Bob.
Whose idea was it to name SI units after dead Scientists? Most shooters could visualise a muzzle energy of 5160 ft/lb but not 7000 Joules. When you look up what a Joule is you find it's one Newton acting over 1 metre, so now you have to look up Newtons.
When the LR special vehicle team was switching over from Imp to Metric, we had some Discoveries and Disco commercials that had a mix of both on the body panels and when we spoke to one of the Browns lane team they said while they were using up the old stock they had both on the line,I had a Ford Essex V6 motor like that, the bell housing holes were tapped 10mm but the rest was UNC. That was U.K. made too.
As a design engineer I can see why they did that - it allows the use of all the stock of existing uprights with the new calipers, it doesn't require a new part number for new uprights, with the chance the right side could be the old one, the left the new . . it means new calipers will fit existing vehicles, with the additional benefit the customer has to spend more money on the new bolts. No need to try to record yet another chassis number where something changed.I'm fairly sure I've mentioned it before but in 1973 (or thereabouts) Girling (the automotive brake people) went metric. As a result, the formerly 2" piston, brake calipers they supplied to Triumph (amongst others) now had 50mm pistons. No big deal really, but they also changed the mounting holes from 7/16" to 12mm. So, did Triumph put an M12 thread in the front uprights of the small chassis triumphs? Of course not, they came up with a bolt with an 11/16" (I think, imperial anyway) head, a 12mm shank and a 7/16" UNF thread![]()
I think all Ford engines are the same - xflow in my trials car certainly is.I had a Ford Essex V6 motor like that, the bell housing holes were tapped 10mm but the rest was UNC. That was U.K. made too.
What CFD package are you using? even for simple Frequency analysis and other multi physics simulations takes hours in Ansys!!that used to take days can now be done instantly at the press of the "Design Hydrostatics" button. That made everything much easier!
You don't work for Airbus do you?!As a design engineer I can see why they did that - it allows the use of all the stock of existing uprights with the new calipers, it doesn't require a new part number for new uprights, with the chance the right side could be the old one, the left the new . . it means new calipers will fit existing vehicles, with the additional benefit the customer has to spend more money on the new bolts. No need to try to record yet another chassis number where something changed.
Which reminds me, My '36 Morris is a mix of metric and imperial. The engine is all metric and the gearbox has a couple of metric bearings (from the factory).I think all Ford engines are the same - xflow in my trials car certainly is.
I had a Ford Essex V6 motor like that, the bell housing holes were tapped 10mm but the rest was UNC. That was U.K. made too.
My 01 Caterham is a mix of metric, BSF and UNC . . .Which reminds me, My '36 Morris is a mix of metric and imperial. The engine is all metric and the gearbox has a couple of metric bearings (from the factory).
Not on mine they weren’t. They were 10mm.The Essex is all Imperial. Bellhousing bolts are 3/8" UNC.