It looks like leaving the eye in place has controlled the damage and prevented separation of tractor and trailer to save the day.The old eye would be far to high for any tractor so maybe it was originally made for a loading shovel. View attachment 363449
Yes it probably didn't need them but I thought I would add a couple of 20mm plate ones.Gussets may be a good idea.
I guess the drawbar extension was done to pull tri-axle trailers as the king pin is a long way back. Whoever did the extension did a good job but unfortunately the original welding of those struts to the thick plate was poor, it had been mig welded with no prep so only about 6mm of weld joining 20mm struts to 25mm plate.Some of the details are hard to see but I assume the trailer is made from a truck frame and the eye offset was added after it was found that the tow point was too high. The thick plate and the struts are old, but were added after the original conversion.
What I can't understand is, why was the extension added?
I get that the tow point had to be lowered, but why extended? Why not just reinforce the lower plate and relocate the eye? At least that way, some lateral rigidity would be retained and you wouldn't need an airfield to turn.
Knowing where the trailer wheels are relative to the tank would help as would the placement of the tow bar on the tractor.
Jack
Those are some of the details that I don't have. With full knowledge, all would probably be clear.I guess the drawbar extension was done to pull tri-axle trailers as the king pin is a long way back. Whoever did the extension did a good job but unfortunately the original welding of those struts to the thick plate was poor, it had been mig welded with no prep so only about 6mm of weld joining 20mm struts to 25mm plate.