foy9999
Member
- Messages
- 316
- Location
- East Kilbride
Can anyone help?
We have a little-used (almost new) machine which keeps breaking belts.
Each time I change the belt I remove the deck completely and put it back on after double-checking the routing of the belt and that all the sheaves are moving freely and the tensioner is not seized.
It works for 5 minutes then you smell burning rubber and the belt snaps.
On closer examination today I found the main LHS pulley/sheave is rubbing slightly on the 'brake-pad' whilst the RHS one isn't
To explain how it works first: When the blades are not 'engaged' the drive from the engine still spins but the belt is loose and the brake pads are supposed to stop the sheaves spinning. This is a weird (but common) design which leaves the belt loose while parts are still in motion.
When a lever by the steering-wheel is pushed fwd (to start cutting) a cable pulls on a large spring attached to a metal arm on the deck. This is supposed to bring the movable sheave (on the end of the arm) into contact with the belt which tensions it and causes it to be tight round the other 4 sheaves plus it takes the brakes off.
So. With the deck off I noticed that there is a lot of slack in the arm-mechanism before it acts on the other components linked to it. The the range of the cable-movement is not sufficient to bring the brake pad fully off the LHS sheave as a lot of the movement takes up the aforementioned slack and when the lever is fully pushed forward the brake-pad is still on the LHS sheave. There is no means of adjusting the cable/spring/arm.
So I'm thinking there needs to be a way to tighten the cable so it pulls the arm further and fully releases the pad(s).
However increasing the pull on the arm increases the tension on the belt as well as moving the pads further and this would perhaps be a problem too. If the belt is too tight it would burn immediately I guess
It might be easier just to remove the brake pad. Why do you need them anyway?
All of this is perhaps a moot point as when we set off to test the machine today we could smell burning and hear clanking before the belt was even engaged,
This would be with the belt loose and the sheaves held stationary with the brake pads.
The clanking sound is probably the un-tensioned arm but I can't understand why the belt would be burning if it's routed correctly and not tight.
Any ideas, before the dealer needs to come and collect it for expensive examination?
Also is it correct to route the belt with the V-shape inwards round the drive pulley? Seems a crazy question but if you do it this way the flat face of the belt is running on the two small inner sheaves
We have a little-used (almost new) machine which keeps breaking belts.
Each time I change the belt I remove the deck completely and put it back on after double-checking the routing of the belt and that all the sheaves are moving freely and the tensioner is not seized.
It works for 5 minutes then you smell burning rubber and the belt snaps.
On closer examination today I found the main LHS pulley/sheave is rubbing slightly on the 'brake-pad' whilst the RHS one isn't
To explain how it works first: When the blades are not 'engaged' the drive from the engine still spins but the belt is loose and the brake pads are supposed to stop the sheaves spinning. This is a weird (but common) design which leaves the belt loose while parts are still in motion.
When a lever by the steering-wheel is pushed fwd (to start cutting) a cable pulls on a large spring attached to a metal arm on the deck. This is supposed to bring the movable sheave (on the end of the arm) into contact with the belt which tensions it and causes it to be tight round the other 4 sheaves plus it takes the brakes off.
So. With the deck off I noticed that there is a lot of slack in the arm-mechanism before it acts on the other components linked to it. The the range of the cable-movement is not sufficient to bring the brake pad fully off the LHS sheave as a lot of the movement takes up the aforementioned slack and when the lever is fully pushed forward the brake-pad is still on the LHS sheave. There is no means of adjusting the cable/spring/arm.
So I'm thinking there needs to be a way to tighten the cable so it pulls the arm further and fully releases the pad(s).
However increasing the pull on the arm increases the tension on the belt as well as moving the pads further and this would perhaps be a problem too. If the belt is too tight it would burn immediately I guess
It might be easier just to remove the brake pad. Why do you need them anyway?
All of this is perhaps a moot point as when we set off to test the machine today we could smell burning and hear clanking before the belt was even engaged,
This would be with the belt loose and the sheaves held stationary with the brake pads.
The clanking sound is probably the un-tensioned arm but I can't understand why the belt would be burning if it's routed correctly and not tight.
Any ideas, before the dealer needs to come and collect it for expensive examination?
Also is it correct to route the belt with the V-shape inwards round the drive pulley? Seems a crazy question but if you do it this way the flat face of the belt is running on the two small inner sheaves