Guy from project on news says still using more to run than they get out, but they are super excited, no wonder, make a giant machine and get paid a fortune, don't worry if you can't get it to work properly
It's progress Jim but not as we know it.
NO!Or will the oil companies suppress the technology?
Guy from project on news says still using more to run than they get out, but they are super excited, no wonder, make a giant machine and get paid a fortune, don't worry if you can't get it to work properly
It's progress Jim but not as we know it.
Both are valid points - I agree it’s fascinating, and probably should be done - whether it will ever amount to a working design is unclear - but if we don’t try we’ll never know. You can see why people might be a little cynical though…But better then commenting on how inefficient it is? But the Oxford people were testing one part of the new engine design. Not trying to make free electric.
Of course it does, no one is saying it doesn’t! Fusion as a practical means of powering electricity generation is a different matter though.Fusion does actually work - it is not pie in the sky
The Victorians would have probably used them to power a giant beam engine![]()
"So cheap it can't be metered".... or something like that.![]()
Ohh I get that it's all prices of a jigsaw, equilibrium on a one 10 times the size just means they have a warm factoryit's not big enough to get more out than in, it was a test run for a reactor being built 10x the size. That one should easily sustain equilbrium going by todays report. Bigger reactors tend to be more efficient so long as we can deal with the heat.
Megawatts, not milliwatts...11mW wouldn't boil a kettle, 11mW is 0.011W. Even the most efficient light bulb would be barely visible at that power.
Ummm...11mw is 11,000kw

That's like saying, hey, lets use plastic explosive as a boiler fuelFusion does actually work - it is not pie in the sky
The Victorians would have probably used them to power a giant beam engine![]()

