Screwdriver
Member
- Messages
- 10,686

I spent a lot of time <not working> on getting that sorted...
You shouldn't be because some of the dims are quite obviously wrong.
Enlighten me.
It's slightly possible that the intended size of 0.5" could have been intentionally undersize and adjusted with a shim or two...
Or it's been subject to some wear.
It's not sour grapes, What on earth would I have to be sour about? The guy wants a spindle made so I looked at the drawing in metric and and it was clear right away that it had been poorly measured or converted, I didn't need your imperial drawing to see that. The age of that machine means it would be drawn in inches and fractions, or decimals where a fit was necessary. Very few of the metric dims convert directly to inch fractions so it stands to reason that it was either poorly measured or poorly converted.
Sorry if you feel insulted or offended but I'm hardly going to sit back and keep schtum when there's a chance that someone might use a poorly dimensioned drawing to produce the man a new spindle.
Additional - if I was to be making that sort of part and I was supplied with those figures, I would want the original part and/or the parts it fits to for verification purposes![]()
Seized bottom bearing at some point in the past?
I'll stop clutching at straws in a minute![]()
It's obviously wrong.
I pointed out what I saw was a mistake in the drawing. Stick it under a CMM and we'll all have a laugh at one of us.
You're the only one claiming phsychic ability, and the only one hurling actual insults. I've already said why I think the drawing was obviously wrong and now you've deleted the drawing that contradicted the one you've left up I don't see that there's much more for me to add. I'll leave you to your gainsay.