Dimitri De Spiegeleer
Member
- Messages
- 178
- Location
- Belgium
you can't put up because of what ... ? EN1090 requirement?
can anyone tell me what a bad welder I am for not knowing exactly what my plant was putting out but instead relying on what I saw during the process and set up and heard during the set up and process.
How does it work if I drop the Amps to run a bead v up with MMA, do I need write that down and get some noddy in a white lab coat to write it in the book for posterity or something?
Being able to set a machine up with parameters suitable for welding up the job in hand is part and parcel of being a good welding tradesman.
Welding procedures are not the same or a replacement for a good tradesman. They are partly there to assist him/her.
It's also there to create a level of traceability, if the main client has given the job to 2 or 3 sub contractors and they are all welding to the same weld procedure them in theory all of the welding should be up to the same approved quality. If you only rely'd on the welder's opinion himself of how much voltage and amperage to use then you can bet that no 3 of the contractors would be producing work to the same standard.
Welders welding right next to each other in the same shop on the same job have parameters that vary wildly. They both cannot be right, but I would bet that they both believe that they are right, It happens every day.
So what makes the guy who sets the parameters such a genius? Go back to were I mentioned copy and paste
Nothing makes him a genius. A weld procedure is "proof" that the weld settings are good and provide a acceptable weld, against which ever spec the client has asked for.
There is nothing wrong pursè in copy and pasting weld procedures provided that the parameters are a suitable match for the job in hand. In most cases the procedure will have to be qualified anyway which means that someone will have to weld the joint in accordance to the procedure and then have it tested to ensure it passes.
If the settings were good enough for one person (and proved via a test) then why shouldn't they be good enough for the next person welding the same job under the same conditions
I'm 21 I've served 2 years of my time as a fabricator/welder, I'm thinking about getting private weld training to become a coded welder. Pipe welder tube or vessel or underwater. This will obviously cost me a few quid so I'm just looking for some advice on whether it will be worth spending £1000+ on it?Yes I see what you mean, don't think I'm making my point well enough lol. All I mean is before this 1090 came in, generally a coded welder made more money than a non coded welder, even if the non coded welder was just as good. So I was just trying to gauge if people thought that this may push wages up really? Hope that makes a bit more sense.
Just so you know, I'm all in favour of this as I have been trying to get my boss to code us anyway as I feel that's just the way it should be.
I got this document today from an SCCS assessor. It is a list of currently agreed items that has been complied by EU members that are not to be covered by 1090. Its not an exhaustive list and will be subject to change and is not yet a formal document, but gives some indication of products that can be manufactured by companies that do not have 1090 accreditation.
A lot of the items on the list, whilst not coming under 1090, do come under other BS's or legislation.
