I’m following with great interest, I’d like to do a Clough42 mod as well on a Boxford @Dcal is sorting for me.I hear you loud and clear but the point I was trying to make is that this belt/pulley profile is very much suited to this application and I will be using this HTD profile on my Clough 42 leadscrew conversion on the Harrison, it is a deep profile and High Torque Drive describes it well. What I am saying is it will not slip, under most any circumstance, getting it taut and removing any backlash a given really.
I’m following with great interest, I’d like to do a Clough42 mod as well on a Boxford @Dcal is sorting for me.
You must be getting old, that was more than two years ago…..Not sure Al, I was really enjoying the journey. It was very good really, I was having good memories of driving up two years ago and collecting George (my Afghan) and seeing @addjunkie s Alpacas so it was a great time remembered. This trip is proving memorable too, I have been welcomed at another forum member's home and his father and I have pretty much fixed the world now.
I am very much looking forward to today and I will get up shortly and find some breakfast and set off.
Humbie heading East towards Haddington/Gifford.Trying to think where I’ve seen manicured hedges, near Humbie?
Getting the spindle servo running was a bit of a challenge, not helped by the first drive either being dead, or due to not having the correct manual for it.
The belt system he is using is used in several commercial CNC machines in the same application.Any slack in the belt is backlash in the system, which cancels the no-backlash of the ballscrew that it is driving.
You would only notice it if doing a profile operation like a handwheel handle where the cross slide has to go in and out as part of the same cut.
There would be some tolerance in the pulley and (rubber) belt manufacture, so the theoretical centre distance is just that and the manufacturer is doing no-one any favours quoting it to 0.1mm.