'Light, strong, cheap. Pick any two' is a popular saying.
Factor in the trade off between strength/hardness and ductility/brittleness and it (hopefully) should be clear that lifespan is a different thing altogether i.e. These lightweight expensive components you don't understand...
I think I understand composite materials a bit better now. I was out cycling this afternoon on a three year old road bike which I've used for several hundred miles but has never been altered, crashed or mistreated.
All of a sudden, with no warning, the CAMPAGNOLO Xenon 9 speed rear mech just snapped off. The first I knew about it was a sudden jamming of the transmission as the rear mech went into the spokes. I was on a cycle path and and did not fall off the bike but it could have been much worse. I just looked up this component. It comes from a leading supplier and is about £30 - so hopefully not 'cheap junk'. And yet it seems this component is not fit for purpose and should never have been used by the bicycle builder. I'm sure my arc welded forks and glued handlebars would last longer than the composites which they have used in this gear changer. Here's a photo of the broken component:
Last edited: