Quick question to those saying the touch screens are dangerous, any of you saying that actually driven a car with one?
I'm about 11k miles and so far have avoided crashing, killing a pedestrian or being so distracted I've driven over a squirrel
I once followed a guy who was tapping away at his dash mounted phone.... in the German lane at 70mph, on a basically empty M6. I was on my bike and gave him a blast on my horn, he swung over one lane left immediately and slowed down.Most modern cars send and receive data!
But I see you can use them if on a mount - so in theory as long as you don't HOLD a phone you can still send texts as long as it is mounted properly![]()
I agree. A car full of screaming kids has to be the biggest distraction of all!I once followed a guy who was tapping away at his dash mounted phone.... in the German lane at 70mph, on a basically empty M6. I was on my bike and gave him a blast on my horn, he swung over one lane left immediately and slowed down.
Yes, he could well have slammed on the brakes and wiped me out, but I wasn't really thinking that far ahead.
I'be often heard that it's not the physical handling of the phone that causes safety issues, when making calls, but the concentration required, and apparently it is as distracting as drink driving, 'tests have shown'....
I've never actually tried using a phone when driving a car, but if I can have a conversation with a person sat next to me, how does that differ to a conversation with someone on the other end of the phone line? What's next, no talking while driving?
I'll never understand the all black thing. For the last few months I've cycled to and from work in the dark every day, the number of people I pass wearing grey or black with no lights astounds me, it's like they want to be ran over.A cyclist went past my place in the dark, going fast down hill, no lights, sitting upright, both hands on his phone looking down texting, as he approached a roundabout.
No idea how he managed to avoid an 'accident', maybe he thought he was being sensible as he didn't have headphones on.
Last weekend, 9am Saturday morning, pretty foggy, heading to my mums house - the number of white/silver/grey cars with no lights on . . and then of course, the other way entirely, as soon as there's a hint of mist four miles away . . . fog lights on . . .I'll never understand the all black thing. For the last few months I've cycled to and from work in the dark every day, the number of people I pass wearing grey or black with no lights astounds me, it's like they want to be ran over.![]()
Mine goes in the centre console and isn't touched until I'm parked up
The nav thing has a lot of discretion, I don't do that anymore but I used to
Get a dual sim phone & stop looking like a drug dealerBoth phones go into centre console armrest. Never ever touched. Both connected to car via Bluetooth, always on the phone when driving but always via the cars controls. Use the vehicle in built sat nav system
Nah, work phone is just for work. It's their device and the data ownership is cut and dried.Get a dual sim phone & stop looking like a drug dealer![]()
What I don't understand is given how dangerous it is to use a smart phone when driving, automakers keep putting in more and more touchscreens in cars which are as dangerous because they give no tactile feedback and force you to look at the screen to get something done.
That's because someone thought that the automotive industry should be allowed to police itself.What I don't understand is given how dangerous it is to use a smart phone when driving, automakers keep putting in more and more touchscreens in cars which are as dangerous because they give no tactile feedback and force you to look at the screen to get something done.
Totally agree - I design HMI for work and for a control panel it’s really easy to add another button to a HMI, whereas a physical button needs holes drilling, wiring, inputs etcThere's a lot of backlash about that at the moment with plenty of studies supporting the return to physical buttons for common functions, as it does contribute to driver distraction. UI and tactile design is a huge field after all there's a reason buttons with tactile feedback were always favoured in vehicles.
I've long suspected part of the reason everything (thermostats, washing machines, etc) has an app these days is because it's cheaper and easier to design a UI with a high res colour touch screen than it is to do it with physical buttons and LED indicators or an alphanumeric display.Totally agree - I design HMI for work and for a control panel it’s really easy to add another button to a HMI, whereas a physical button needs holes drilling, wiring, inputs etc
The bmw I drive was excellent with a big scroll wheel to select functions, but could still be quite distracting when you have to look away to the screen. The heater controls on my 5 series were still discrete buttons which were easy to use, you only needed the menu system for stuff that you didn’t need to adjust on the move anyway, or the radio functions which were quite intuitive even using the i drive system. It was probably the best car Ive had in terms of ergonomics.Some of the insignias I drove had a good system. A command knob/wheel for scrolling through and push down to select. Then they replaced it with a stupid mouse pad affair.
I’ve just done 4 big control panels for materials testing in a lab, their previous ones had a jumble of panel mounted controllers, buttons, potentiometers and indicators - we’ve replaced them all with a big HMI - the only buttons they have are an e stop and a couple of reset buttons.I've long suspected part of the reason everything (thermostats, washing machines, etc) has an app these days is because it's cheaper and easier to design a UI with a high res colour touch screen than it is to do it with physical buttons and LED indicators or an alphanumeric display.