Give us more info? Was this a dunlop tyre? Was it the slick that Dunlop had officially withdrawn prior to the TY/. If so, why was it in use?
There is nothing (much, thus far) to complain about unless it is just a grump from the OP.
It doesn’t look like a bean counter problem, to me. Looks more like a technology failure.
. I only say 200kmh as that was about the max speed on the track you could get from the 400cc four strokes. For those that follow the GP here in AU the Philip Island circiut we turn in to turn one at 207kph with a slipstream. We actuall go through there with the throttle pinned. Long gone are those days, still got the bike and bits Substituting components for cheaper ones would most likely result in wear or grip issues, that’s definitely catastrophic failure. There will be a lot of twitchy bum bums at Dunlop at the moment, that’s for sure.Give us more info? Was this a dunlop tyre? Was it the slick that Dunlop had officially withdrawn prior to the TY/. If so, why was it in use?
There is nothing (much, thus far) to complain about unless it is just a grump from the OP.
It doesn’t look like a bean counter problem, to me. Looks more like a technology failure.
Interesting, have it recording but havent watched yet.
Didnt F1 recently have problems with Pirelli tyres on the news? -cba to watch that it makes me fall asleep!
I watched a documentary about Seagrave some time back. The tyres on his car were rated for something like 400mph for 20 seconds. I can't mind the actual figures their life expectancy wasn't that much.
I'm also amused how the beabcounters are blamed with absolutely no evidence save a broken tyre.






