winchman
Member
- Messages
- 6,215
- Location
- Merseyside
I will take some later.Have you got any closer pictures of the micrometer. I may be interested
I will take some later.Have you got any closer pictures of the micrometer. I may be interested
skin flint,Tell your friend they are worthless, someone on here will give you a fiver
I still work in imperial, I cant stand machining in metric, having old imperial machines, might have something to do with it though......Have sets of these on the ships for measuring engine liner wear. Unfortunately doubt anyone will want them outside of a stationary diesel power plant engineer or a marine engineer even then would have to be metric to make them really useful these days.
I agree, Imperial is much easier. They made a monumental fu in the workshop. They wanted a stainless steel counter top folded up. I measured up at 7ft 6in. They decided to measure it in metric. It should have been 2286 but they measured 2086mm. Every time they make a mistake, it’s always 100mm or 200mm out. That doesn’t happen with Imperial.I still work in imperial, I cant stand machining in metric, having old imperial machines, might have something to do with it though......
But I do prefer the imperial system, I'm just an old fart...![]()
did a drawing for toughened glass panels used in one of our machines to cover some halogen lamps.I agree, Imperial is much easier. They made a monumental fu in the workshop. They wanted a stainless steel counter top folded up. I measured up at 7ft 6in. They decided to measure it in metric. It should have been 2286 but they measured 2086mm. Every time they make a mistake, it’s always 100mm or 200mm out. That doesn’t happen with Imperial.
Mmm yes stuff for oil and gas it like that, some made metric others imperial. Decimal 8nches I dint mind but all that 13/64malarky does my nut in.I've sat in design offices both sides of the pond, so had to work in both units - and depending on company, decimal inches, or fractions . . . and some prefer different limits to fractions . . . and when you swap to feet . . .
So I can make really good cock-ups in both units![]()
All the time!If I'm measuring for me, in imperial and I'm doing the cutting as well it's often 37ins + 1/4" + 2 bits depending on the tape measure and where you start to measure from on the tape (the hook or possibly the 10" mark just to get away from the silly little bits)....
Doesn't help anyone else but does keep it interesting, does anyone else use this method???
If I'm measuring for me, in imperial and I'm doing the cutting as well it's often 37ins + 1/4" + 2 bits depending on the tape measure and where you start to measure from on the tape (the hook or possibly the 10" mark just to get away from the silly little bits)....
Doesn't help anyone else but does keep it interesting, does anyone else use this method???
You’re right, I find it very easy to cock up a long measurement on a tape in metric, partly due to having to find the nearest m I guess. Feet and inches if it’s long, mm if less than a metre for me.Yep.
Plus I also have measurements like 3ft, 2ins, 3mm.
Ideal world (for me) would be "meters" divided into 36 "inches" of 24mm each There's something about multiples of 12 that just *work*, so much better than multiples of 10.
Sorted should have stuck with 36,12,Yep.
Plus I also have measurements like 3ft, 2ins, 3mm.
Ideal world (for me) would be "meters" divided into 36 "inches" of 24mm each There's something about multiples of 12 that just *work*, so much better than multiples of 10.
It's the fractional parts of inches that bug me:Sorted should have stuck with 36,12,
![]()