As for power distribution, solar, some wind and micro-hydro should help, as no longer is all the power coming from a few central sources. Combined heat and power could further make production and use closer, so requiring fewer increases to the network.
One Source said that if we went all electric, we would at times need 5 times the electrical power, that we now have available.
Then someone is lying to us , we either have just about sufficient capacity now in which case we don’t have enough or we currently have a huge overcapacityWhat source?
I have had huge dealings with ENWL lately, upgrading the supply to 3 tower blocks (183 properties) and after the meetings the talk inevitably turned to electric cars, suffice to say they are not worried, even if uptake massively increases
10% per year, maybeI've seen a quote recently from National Grid stating they believe electricity generation needs the grow by 10% to accommodate electric vehicle charging
They were claiming we do generate enough electricity but it's the peaks they struggle with, if intelligent chargers were used to fluctuate the feeds to electric vehicle charging it'll will cope
Then someone is lying to us , we either have just about sufficient capacity now in which case we don’t have enough or we currently have a huge overcapacity
Adding in the all electric home heating too ?Or, and this maybe a bit of a mad idea, we are building more capacity?
The huge off shore wind farm off the east coast is only getting bigger and its located somewhere the wind rarely drops, the nuclear plant is being built
Plus electric cars only make up a fraction of total sales, if they stop selling petrol and diesel cars in 2030 how many decades before they are all off the road?
Also im personally involved in projects that will reduce electricity consumption per household by 30-40%, one starting in the North East is 2000 properties, thats a lot of electricity going spare
Only catch is producing the hydrogen, for that you need electricity.......The hydrogen economy is now taking off and most domestic heating boilers will be able to run off hydrogen and according to Bosch Worcester the calorific value of natural gas is higher than hydrogen but hydrogen is more dense so they get the same output per cubic metre of gas consumed, the one real issue is that only 11% of UK boilers can be run from hydrogen as they are within range of the proposed production sites.
In what stored form is hydrogen more dense than natural gas? Natural gas comes out of the ground; it's a fossil fuel, but as pointed out above, hydrogen has to be manufactured using electricity. It's not a fuel, simply an energy transfer medium... and it catches fire so very easilythe calorific value of natural gas is higher than hydrogen but hydrogen is more dense
I’m sorry your going to have to explain that again, it doesn’t make any sense whatsoever - hydrogen is literally the least dense gas on earth….The hydrogen economy is now taking off and most domestic heating boilers will be able to run off hydrogen and according to Bosch Worcester the calorific value of natural gas is higher than hydrogen but hydrogen is more dense so they get the same output per cubic metre of gas consumed, the one real issue is that only 11% of UK boilers can be run from hydrogen as they are within range of the proposed production sites.
What and how?
Household electricity consumption, per household, is already pretty damn low, so what and how can you be reducing it by 30% or more?
Electric heating is, and always has been, as near to 100% efficient as it is possible to get
Most modern electronics are constant power devices so any changes to voltage are irrelevant as they will maintain the same power consumption.
Adding in the all electric home heating too ?