brewdexta
The biggest tool in the box
- Messages
- 5,589
- Location
- UK
Positivity dictates the ice berg that sunk the titanic was, in fact defective. The positive view was that in a maritime collision between two ships one would stay afloat and each could have half the necessary lifeboats. The ice berg did float but alas was missing it's life boats.
I have a different perspective on being positive. IMO the above example is a combination of greed, over optimism and gross stupidity. The WHO when they voted to try and eradicate the biggest viral killer of all time, Smallpox despite a lot of neigh sayers. It worked. You have to be positive to take on a huge undertaking like that, it doesn't mean you are wildly optimistic.
To solve the planets problems we need to change our mind set. Interestingly I read a market report from Bloomberg forecasting EV and ICE usage Lithium battery costs and supply yesterday etc. I'm not sure the full detailed report with data sources is available publicly, you normally have to pay for the detailed analysis and we have a work wide subscription to Bloomberg and others but here's the public summary. The report indicated that by 2025 the battery per kWh price would make EV cars competitive with ICE cars. Fossil fuels would still be the predominant transport fuel by a huge margin even up to 2040 and beyond but EV private cars would be making big inroads into ICE cars. All car manufacturers have invested in using old car batteries as static storage, Lithium is plentiful and cheap, currently in over supply. Yep, there are issues, that's where we need to be positive to solve them.
Re the oil, no simple answers. However there are many countries with no natural product without oil revenue which, if the population has increased the same way and oil never been found, would have starving people.
Instead they have corruption, pollution and still have starving people.
I think we may need to agree to differ on these topics in case we bore the forum to death!
Cheers
Andy