bigegg
Scream Not Working Because Space Make Deaf
- Messages
- 9,651
- Location
- Leeds, West Yorkshire
The assumption is that roads will not evolve to match ACs -
I don't think that's neccesarily accurate, in the medium term (ie, 10-20 years).
I would expect drop off points to evolve - even if you owned a car, rather than renting the nearest a la "bike sharing", you wouldn't need it parked at your destination because you could send it a couple of streets away to park - less parked cars on the street means less hazards.
If you then fenced off roads, you would remove a second hazard.
Roads could be made narrower since autovehicles can judge width better than us - doors could be only opened if the way was clear, and approaching traffic could be warned in advance to take an alternative route if a delivery lorry is parked in a residential street.
Long term, roads could be moved underground or above head height. - or pedestrian paths could.
I'm thinking the m1, same width as now, but taking 10 or 12 lanes of traffic - no central reservation, and central lanes reversing direction as needed to account for traffic flow.
Add a segregated, covered, cycle path with an airflow to push you in the right direction (and uphill assist) to busy town roads, and you could remove 70%? of rush hour traffic within 50 years.
Economically speaking: I read an essay a few years ago regarding increased automation.
It concluded that eventually, automation would reach a point where very little human "labour" would have to be done. Everyone would have a good standard of living, with plenty of free time to devote to hobbies - it might have been "star trek"
I don't think that's neccesarily accurate, in the medium term (ie, 10-20 years).
I would expect drop off points to evolve - even if you owned a car, rather than renting the nearest a la "bike sharing", you wouldn't need it parked at your destination because you could send it a couple of streets away to park - less parked cars on the street means less hazards.
If you then fenced off roads, you would remove a second hazard.
Roads could be made narrower since autovehicles can judge width better than us - doors could be only opened if the way was clear, and approaching traffic could be warned in advance to take an alternative route if a delivery lorry is parked in a residential street.
Long term, roads could be moved underground or above head height. - or pedestrian paths could.
I'm thinking the m1, same width as now, but taking 10 or 12 lanes of traffic - no central reservation, and central lanes reversing direction as needed to account for traffic flow.
Add a segregated, covered, cycle path with an airflow to push you in the right direction (and uphill assist) to busy town roads, and you could remove 70%? of rush hour traffic within 50 years.
Economically speaking: I read an essay a few years ago regarding increased automation.
It concluded that eventually, automation would reach a point where very little human "labour" would have to be done. Everyone would have a good standard of living, with plenty of free time to devote to hobbies - it might have been "star trek"
