BrokenBiker
Member
- Messages
- 11,241
- Location
- Newport, South Wales
pointless to some-but not to motorcycle afficionados. The 6 cylinder 250 Honda was (is) almost a piece of automotive jewellry-tiny pistons and con rods etc. Sochiro Hondas philosophy was geared to the 4 stroke engine so they built the 250 multi to compete with the advance of the 2 stroke racing machines which became all conquering-and Honda had to capitulate and build 2stroke GP500 bikes etc.hmm a pointless video
Sochiro Honda has passed on now so he has missed the introduction of the 4 stroke engine into the premium motorcycle racing class which would have made him happy-the 2 strokes were not beaten it was pollution regs that really did for them .
IIRC the 125 was a four pot. Even so, the pistons would be smaller than the 250/6 pistons. They must have been tiny!Hideously painful, al those tiny pistons and valves. Makes me cringe.
Was there a 125 6 as well?
Proper Flat Trackers/Board Trackers with pedals and no clutches. I have a JAP 650cc side valve magneto engine from an old Howard rotovator that I plan on sticking in a rigid frame and making a Board Tracker. I am going to cheat though and fit a Burman 3 speed gearbox/clutch unit on. Don't fancy having to stall the bike at every set of lights and bump start it away again!Too young Gordon, but I went looking for it. Probably seen pictures or short pieces on it without knowing what it was. Did not have the aural impact I was hoping for.
Never mind, this may intrigue. Flat trackers.
Does anybody remember the V16 1.5ltr 600BHP engine made by BRM in the early 50s.
I think you could be right-but all the rising sun manufacturers must have seen the writng on the wall for the road going strokers-and a lot of folks like to buy a machine for the road which has some tenous link to the high end race machine-2S road machines are pretty much dead meat now so having 2S race machines would not be relative to whats in the showrooms. The daft thing is though,IIRC, when Moto GP was conceived, the bikes had to be one off prototypes so there was (is?- I don't keep up with it now) no relation to a machine you could buy in the showroom anyway.Now I've always blamed Honda for being partially responsible for the demise of 2 strokes as they couldn't compete with Suzuki & Yamaha so convinced every one 2 strokes were the spawn of the devil and would bring about the end of the world.
I think the writing was on the wall for 2 strokes from the early 90s, maybe earlier. (Super bikes started around 1988, this was probably the beginning of the end)I think you could be right-but all the rising sun manufacturers must have seen the writng on the wall for the road going strokers-and a lot of folks like to buy a machine for the road which has some tenous link to the high end race machine-2S road machines are pretty much dead meat now so having 2S race machines would not be relative to whats in the showrooms. The daft thing is though,IIRC, when Moto GP was conceived, the bikes had to be one off prototypes so there was (is?- I don't keep up with it now) no relation to a machine you could buy in the showroom anyway.
Another factor -possibly-that shocked the elitist 2S crowd was Troy Corser equalling the 500 GP (2S bikes) lap times at Donington on a Ducati-and that was on the 8 valve "tractor"- Ducati had the Testastretta motor yet to come.Maybe a wake up call that the "diesels" performance was closing the gap.
if I could have only 1 bike in my garage it would be Eddie Lawson's 1989 rothmans honda nsr500 - simply awesome![]()