Ross365
Member
- Messages
- 1,985
- Location
- UK
The old Suffolk engine has a breather valve that sits in the "valve chest". It allows air to leave the crankcase on the downstroke of the piston.
Perhaps more importantly, these engines are lubricated by "oil mist", and the only oil mist that can get to the valve stems must go through the breather valve, but you'd have to believe that not much can go that way.
I've seen lots of pictures of old Briggs and Stratton engines and Tecumseh which are comparable in design (the so-called "L" engines where the valve seats are upper most). From what I've seen the B&S has a hole in the bottom on the valve chest to allow breathing and lubrication (just like the Suffolk), but I've not yet seen picture of one that has a valve fitted in that hole, nor the Tecumseh.
Can anyone confirm that the B&S and Tecumseh doesn't have the valve, and the possibility that taking the valve out of the Suffolk might improve lubrication of the valve stems? I realise that someone at Suffolk thought the valve was a good idea, but he may not have thought that these engines would be working 40-50 years later, and worn stems and guides got to be a problem?
I just re-fitted the valves in the Punch and compressed the valves in a vice and held them compressed using cable ties. Never done that before, but it works well in the absence of a small compressor tool.
Perhaps more importantly, these engines are lubricated by "oil mist", and the only oil mist that can get to the valve stems must go through the breather valve, but you'd have to believe that not much can go that way.
I've seen lots of pictures of old Briggs and Stratton engines and Tecumseh which are comparable in design (the so-called "L" engines where the valve seats are upper most). From what I've seen the B&S has a hole in the bottom on the valve chest to allow breathing and lubrication (just like the Suffolk), but I've not yet seen picture of one that has a valve fitted in that hole, nor the Tecumseh.
Can anyone confirm that the B&S and Tecumseh doesn't have the valve, and the possibility that taking the valve out of the Suffolk might improve lubrication of the valve stems? I realise that someone at Suffolk thought the valve was a good idea, but he may not have thought that these engines would be working 40-50 years later, and worn stems and guides got to be a problem?
I just re-fitted the valves in the Punch and compressed the valves in a vice and held them compressed using cable ties. Never done that before, but it works well in the absence of a small compressor tool.