Well I was gonna make a point that you don't "need" to remove the oxide layer on the back side as it's not going to offer any advantage. But then wmj did say he'd read it helps with X-ray Quality and I can't argue with that . I don't think it makes any odds if It's removed on either side if the Alu is clean. The EP doesn't need to remove it on the back side because it doesn't remove it on the front either. It temporarily pushes it to the sides before the Alu itself regenerates a new one an hour after. The other side the root pushes through the Alu easy but tends to stay blanketed behind the oxide layer so granted it's not as attractive as the front side.
From a joint strength PoV I don't think it makes a difference but regard to what is gonna be picked up on X-ray and failed then yes I can quite believe it needs to be removed. Same with the etched zone on the front side id imagine.
It's now turned into a slagging match. X-ray and dye pen are not comparable I but I do agree with Runnarch's first comment it's not needed, it's Welded often with the backsides left as they are. I agree with wmj also for X-ray standard of welding it may well be the standard required.
A backside purge on Alu. I have not done that before. What does it do to the root side?A wee sneaky argon trap would take care of root side, when welding from face side.
Hydrogen is a common cause of contamination in Alu. If stored very cold it sucks in moisture like a sponge and can be a big problem.Aluminium oxide cause you any problems getting your cross sections passed? Porosity from the oxide containing hydrogen?
Any of you guys coded in ally?
Aluminium oxide cause you any problems getting your cross sections passed? Porosity from the oxide containing hydrogen?
Keeps root side clean and, free from oxides. G'nite, Richard.