I think what some people are missing is that BOTH the employee and the employer can be at fault and remedial action by the employer doesn't stop the employees obligation to operate in a safe way. It can be argued that an experienced supervisor/manager should be aware of the dangers of the machines in their area and never should have laid their hand there. (as well as the employer should have had guards. One doesn't negate the others responsibilities.
Whilst a GM charge is very heavy it is not impossible that it could be "fair" within the law.
I have just read this and whilst I understand contributary negligence is a factor in some cases. This seems rather unfair as opposed to fair.
Wonder what @Parm has to say.
Whilst a GM charge is very heavy it is not impossible that it could be "fair" within the law.
I have just read this and whilst I understand contributary negligence is a factor in some cases. This seems rather unfair as opposed to fair.
Wonder what @Parm has to say.